OK, disclaimer done. Here I go:
Why did I decide to write a post about graffiti tonight? Well, earlier today I took my camera for a walk on the bike path that runs between the Hudson River and the Feeder Canal. It was sunny and I had a lovely walk, between a parking area by a dam, down to a bridge near a public beach, and back again. When I got to the bridge, I thought I'd look under it for a photo of the water and reflections, but instead I saw offensive graffiti. I took a photo, but I will not post it here, because, well, it consisted of several swastikas and a pro-Hitler statement, and I'm just not comfortable posting it on a blog that is a reflection of me. (So the other photos I took today will have to suffice for this post.) This piece of graffiti disturbed me and suddenly I felt uncomfortable and vulnerable walking alone. I walked quickly and didn't take another photo for the rest of my way back to my car. I'm hoping if I call the city tomorrow that someone will be able to remove this graffiti.
So I have often seen blog posts or posts in the Facebook Art Teachers group about graffiti projects being done in the art classroom. Some of them are from elementary art programs, others are secondary. Often they have been lessons in 'graffiti-style lettering', or designing your own 'tag'. But when I think of actual graffiti 'tags' I have seen, they have often been on the walls of urban buildings, on the side of train cars, or on the walls of the subway tunnels. These are frequently representative of gang symbols. They are not something I want my students to replicate or emulate.
I am not unaware of graffiti/street artists artists that have become well-known and respected, such as the most obvious ones: Keith Haring, (who may have begun as a graffiti artist, but actually also produced street art by commission and sold work in galleries) or Banksy; nor am I unaware of the many graffiti artists making beautiful works of art on the sides of otherwise uninteresting urban buildings, or provocative political or social statements through their street art. But still, the bulk of graffiti I have seen is 'tagging', or offensive vandalism such as that I saw today.
So my question is this: Do graffiti art projects belong in the art curriculum? Is it appropriate to be teaching kids the art of graffiti-style lettering or 'tagging'?
I looked up the definition of graffiti, came up with many versions, but basically the idea was the same: Graffiti is any writing or drawing on a surface in a public place, placed there without authorization of the owner or the object on which it is written. Such graffiti are usually unwelcome, and are considered a form of vandalism.
I can certainly understand a high school art teacher showing the movie Enter Through the Gift Shop, and discussing Banksy, political art and social activism, just as I can understand showing How to Draw a Bunny and discussing the rather peculiar mail art of Ray Johnson. But I absolutely cannot understand the purpose for, or curricular appropriateness of teaching elementary, middle, or high school kids how to do graffiti-style lettering.
In this day and age, when art programs are being slashed and positions are being cut, as art educators we have the responsibility to advocate for our programs. We use art shows as a way to bring the art of our students to our communities, and gather public support. We send home artwork with our students so that parents can see what their children are doing. We seek to convince our school communities that art education is a valuable and essential link in the education of our nation's children. How many community members, parents, and administrators would see the teaching of graffiti as positive PR for your art program?
If you teach graffiti art in your classroom, what is its significance in your curriculum, your justification for its inclusion? I'd love your responses!
I'll leave you with a link to a short article, Graffiti is Always Vandalism I found while researching information for this post. Thank you for reading, and for your opinions!